In order to give greater emphasis to the comments that we consider very interesting, we promote them to the rank of Post.
renewal said ...
Since the operation began and the barrier minimization problem in piedmont truck (and the station of Saint Lucia) let's make a further clarification numerico.Il said the excavation is 10,000 q / li / day, for a load average of 250 kg / them for trucks, 40 trucks are gone, then 80 trips per day. This is true assuming 5 working days, but there is nowhere written that the excavation should be context! It is important not to open the gate, because once you accept the transit and its consequences, no one will prevent someone to increase the daily rate of excavation or worse, add more (see Caprioli cultivation Cava). Greetings to all.
February 4, 2008 16:02
Anonymous said ...
agree with Renewal. at this moment the attention of citizens must be maximum, we are at a stage where maybe you can 'do anything yet to find a solution. Once the doors open will be 'difficult for our citizens to control the situation and certainly we can not prevent the use of the airport and the route to other cities' economic sector. In light of the technical proposals that our impact to val. environment offered by the Saint Lucia foothills and I think there will be a deterioration in the quality of vita.Noto still a voltage drop by your Committee, I see no more 'in the newspapers. Tactical pause waiting for the political events announced? To return Gazzettino's article, I expected a response from Mr. Alderman in the newspapers. This item in the evening I did not see anything. Does anyone know anything? Wish to publish please. thanks
February 6, 2008 0:18
Anonymous said ... Sorry
if I speak again, but after careful reading of Article. Gazzettino I have a strange feeling. There is talk of EIA Budoia, plan for viab. Alternatively, it integrates with the resolution of the City Council, which says no to the passage of the truck? or are we already wriggling? Or, explain to me, are a means to oppose? I would appreciate the views of other bloggers. Attention then, 'cause your "piece de resistance" must be Saint Lucia. Once Budoia equip the station for environmental protection and the content around the home, is still the foothills ko. I see between the two communities and between the citizens of the same countries a unity of purpose, a compact body of opinion, that brings your administrators to Joint Action. would be deleterious Polcenigo go on one side (alternative) and Budoia from another. (One at the airport with adequate environmental protections). Please publish
February 6, 2008 0:41
ramon said ...
You can not make a distinction between the problems of individual localities or countries without taking into account that the roads will be affected by environmental and logistical support along the way foothills. Obvious that the committees must act on their own even if some future strategies could be agreed. As to the freight station of Santa Lucia is considered not fit for purpose being very close to residences that were never meant to be built, especially after authorities were made aware of a project that I consider very important. There is an industrial zone that would cover this and the industrial zones have been created specifically to solve problemmi linked to production. Having said that beyond the fact that the proposed route could easily be modified so without damaging the environment and solving problems impacting the viability even of flasks, any protection would certainly not be adequate to meet the standards of noise pollution and viigenti environmental dust and particulate matter since even the locomotives are not electrified at least ora.C 'then the danger is that in future such scales can be used for additional purposes that at present it is difficult prevedere.Vi are home to just 60,150 mt and the airport does not mean that in future may become intermodal center to the industrial estate and possibly other budoiese reality. It would be interesting therefore to review the project with greater foresight and progettazionein so as not to damage public property owners already at 50%, since the rest is part of the debt.
0 comments:
Post a Comment